The 2011 Acura RDX ranks 8 out of 8 Luxury Compact SUVs. This ranking is based on our analysis of 72 published reviews and test drives of the Acura RDX, and our analysis of reliability and safety data.
The 2011 Acura RDX is a nimble and comfortable compact SUV that has plenty of high-tech features. However, complaints about the interior and the engine’s power delivery may make you think twice.
The Acura RDX used to be the obvious choice for luxury compact SUV buyers. Fun to drive, stuffed with high-tech features and comfortable around town, the RDX was the go-to car for families who needed something practical, but wanted something upscale.
However, other compact SUVs have caught up to the RDX. And, next to the new competition, the RDX isn’t the slam dunk it once was. Consumer Guide says, “While RDX is among the least expensive premium-compact SUVs, its non-linear power delivery, stiff ride, and subpar cabin appointments make it a weak value in this class."
Still, if you want something that’s fun to drive and has a luxury badge (but not quite a luxury price) the RDX won’t disappoint. Just know that if the RDX isn’t your first choice, you don’t have to settle. While you’ll probably have to pay more to get one, there are plenty of other great upscale small SUVs out there.
Other Luxury SUVs to Consider
If you don’t need the sporty feel of the RDX, consider getting the Volvo XC60. Like the RDX, it has plenty of high-tech safety features. But, reviewers like its cabin better and it has more passenger space. Plus, it’s one of the few SUVs in the class that can come close to the RDX’s low price.
If you’re willing to spend more and want a premium interior, take a look at the Audi Q5. While the Audi Q5 used to lag the RDX when it comes to fuel economy, a new turbocharged four-cylinder engine gets the Q5 better fuel economy than the RDX. It costs about $2,500 more, but many reviewers say it’s worth it.
Details: Acura RDX
The RDX comes in two trim levels -- the base and the RDX with Technology Package. Front-wheel drive is standard and all-wheel drive is optional.
"Unlike the automaker's new TSX V6, where the changes were largely restricted to the bits you don't see, the opposite is true of the RDX. Acura's cute 'ute gets a mid-cycle facelift to bring it in-line with the rest of the Acura line-up -- meaning if you haven't warmed up to Acura's shield grille you might want to look elsewhere."
"A nice-handling little SUV with useful cabin tech features . . . plagued by an inefficient power train."
"The new RDX isn't just an ugly face though, it also gets decontented over the last version. Whereas the last RDX came with ‘Super-Handling AWD' only, the new version adds a front wheel drive version with the same engine motivating things. It should be faster, but it'll never outrun the ugly, and with a base price of $32,520, we'd rather wait for a bus."
"We think the RDX proves that driving fun doesn't necessarily take a back seat when you have to buy a sport utility. If you're in the market, this SUV's well worth a test drive."
The 2011 Acura RDX is a nimble and comfortable compact SUV that has plenty of high-tech features. However, complaints about the interior and the engine’s power delivery may make you think twice.
The Acura RDX used to be the obvious choice for luxury compact SUV buyers. Fun to drive, stuffed with high-tech features and comfortable around town, the RDX was the go-to car for families who needed something practical, but wanted something upscale.
However, other compact SUVs have caught up to the RDX. And, next to the new competition, the RDX isn’t the slam dunk it once was. Consumer Guide says, “While RDX is among the least expensive premium-compact SUVs, its non-linear power delivery, stiff ride, and subpar cabin appointments make it a weak value in this class."
Still, if you want something that’s fun to drive and has a luxury badge (but not quite a luxury price) the RDX won’t disappoint. Just know that if the RDX isn’t your first choice, you don’t have to settle. While you’ll probably have to pay more to get one, there are plenty of other great upscale small SUVs out there.
Other Luxury SUVs to Consider
If you don’t need the sporty feel of the RDX, consider getting the Volvo XC60. Like the RDX, it has plenty of high-tech safety features. But, reviewers like its cabin better and it has more passenger space. Plus, it’s one of the few SUVs in the class that can come close to the RDX’s low price.
If you’re willing to spend more and want a premium interior, take a look at the Audi Q5. While the Audi Q5 used to lag the RDX when it comes to fuel economy, a new turbocharged four-cylinder engine gets the Q5 better fuel economy than the RDX. It costs about $2,500 more, but many reviewers say it’s worth it.
Details: Acura RDX
The RDX comes in two trim levels -- the base and the RDX with Technology Package. Front-wheel drive is standard and all-wheel drive is optional.
"Unlike the automaker's new TSX V6, where the changes were largely restricted to the bits you don't see, the opposite is true of the RDX. Acura's cute 'ute gets a mid-cycle facelift to bring it in-line with the rest of the Acura line-up -- meaning if you haven't warmed up to Acura's shield grille you might want to look elsewhere."
"A nice-handling little SUV with useful cabin tech features . . . plagued by an inefficient power train."
"The new RDX isn't just an ugly face though, it also gets decontented over the last version. Whereas the last RDX came with ‘Super-Handling AWD' only, the new version adds a front wheel drive version with the same engine motivating things. It should be faster, but it'll never outrun the ugly, and with a base price of $32,520, we'd rather wait for a bus."
"We think the RDX proves that driving fun doesn't necessarily take a back seat when you have to buy a sport utility. If you're in the market, this SUV's well worth a test drive."